Independent cold-chain and engineering consultants
Case — Defining a −25 °C frozen distribution project before sourcing
Independent cold-chain consultant advising a regional food logistics operator that had outgrown a leased frozen facility. Brief on day one was only 'we need about 3,000 pallets of freezer space, get us quotes'. Budget band USD $4M–$7M.
Before
- Client brief was a pallet number with no temperature band, throughput profile or redundancy expectation
- Two suppliers had already been contacted informally and were designing to two different assumptions
- No written design basis the consultant could sign, defend at audit or attach to an RFQ
- Energy — the single largest operating cost over ten years — was absent from every early conversation
After
- Five compliant proposals priced against one design basis; raw spread of about 27% narrowed to roughly 11% after normalisation
- The cheapest raw bid excluded controls integration and commissioning — roughly USD $180K–$260K of scope
- Consultant billed the signed design basis, exclusions register and normalised comparison pack as project deliverables
- Award decided on ten-year cost and service response, with the client's engineer confirming final sizing before signature
Sourcing approach
- Definition phase run first: duty, capacity, redundancy and energy modelled before any supplier was invited
- Throughput profile converted into an infiltration and door-traffic allowance instead of a rule-of-thumb margin
- Exclusions written into the RFQ up front: electrical infeed, racking, floor heating, controls integration, commissioning and spares
- Five suppliers pre-qualified on comparable frozen-DC references and local service coverage, then invited to one identical pack
ColdMatch RFQ timeline
- Week 0Brief converted into a design basis. Pallet count, product mix and −25 °C target turned into a design duty in kW with an optimistic, base and pessimistic range instead of a single number. Cooling-load calculator
- Week 1Capacity and footprint check. 3,000 pallet positions validated against the available footprint, aisle strategy and dock traffic before any supplier was asked to price. Warehouse capacity planner
- Week 1Energy and lifecycle model. Annual energy and ten-year cost modelled for the design duty so the award criteria existed before proposals arrived. Refrigeration TCO calculator
- Week 2RFQ pack issued. Design basis exported as the technical annex, exclusions named line by line, and the pack issued to five pre-qualified suppliers on the same day. RFQ builder
- Week 3–5Market period. Clarifications answered once in writing and reissued to every bidder, keeping the comparison like-for-like.
- Week 6–7Normalisation. Exclusions priced back onto one scope and each design's annual energy compared before any commercial discussion. Refrigeration bid comparison
- Week 8Recommendation. Consultant issued a written recommendation on ten-year cost, compliance evidence and service coverage.
Calculators for this audience
Produced the design duty in kW/TR that became the RFQ technical annex — the step that made every later bid comparable.
Warehouse capacity plannerConfirmed 3,000 pallet positions fit the footprint before the pallet number was written into a tender.
Refrigeration TCO calculatorSet ten-year energy and service cost as an award criterion during definition, not after bids arrived.
RFQ readiness scoreChecked the pack was complete — duty, exclusions, documents and programme — before it reached suppliers.
Refrigeration bid comparisonPriced exclusions onto one scope so the client compared scope, not sales writing.
