Planning tool

CO2 vs Ammonia Comparison Calculator

Compare CO2 and ammonia industrial refrigeration on the same duty, climate and tariff. Outputs indicative CAPEX, annual energy and maintenance cost, and 10-year total cost of ownership.

Indicative comparison

MetricCO2Ammonia
System COP1.901.90
Absorbed power316 kW316 kW
Indicative CAPEXUSD 690,000USD 600,000
Annual energyUSD 227,368USD 227,368
Annual maintenanceUSD 24,150USD 27,000
10-year TCOUSD 3,205,184USD 3,143,684
10-year difference
USD 61,500
Lower TCO in this scenario
Ammonia

Excludes safety and compliance engineering, machinery room works, permitting, heat-recovery credits and local labour rates — all of which can change the outcome.

Ask suppliers to quote both refrigerants on identical duty and boundary conditions — ColdMatch structures the RFQ so the comparison is fair.

ColdMatch Group is a supplier-neutral procurement platform — not a manufacturer, contractor or lender.

Estimates Only: This calculator is provided for general informational purposes only. Results are approximate and may contain errors, omissions, or outdated information. They do not constitute legal, financial, engineering, tax, technical, or professional advice. Users are solely responsible for independently verifying all calculations, specifications, prices, regulations, and requirements with qualified professionals before making any decisions. By using this calculator, you acknowledge that the website owners, operators, and affiliates accept no responsibility or liability for any loss, damage, or decisions resulting from its use.

Buyer questions

Is CO2 or ammonia better for industrial refrigeration?
Neither is universally better. Ammonia is generally more efficient at large duties and in hot climates, while CO2 avoids toxicity restrictions, suits tighter machinery rooms and performs well in cool and temperate climates, especially with parallel compression. Duty, climate, siting rules and available service skills decide the answer.
Why does climate matter so much for CO2?
CO2 transcritical systems lose efficiency above the critical point, so higher ambient temperatures raise energy consumption unless parallel compression, ejectors or adiabatic gas coolers are used. In hot climates a cascade arrangement or ammonia plant often wins on energy.
What is not included in this comparison?
Safety and compliance engineering, machinery room construction, permitting, insurance differences, operator training, heat-recovery credits and local labour rates. These can move the outcome and must be priced by suppliers for your specific site.
Can ColdMatch recommend a refrigerant?
ColdMatch is refrigerant-neutral. We help structure an RFQ that asks suppliers to quote both options on the same duty, assumptions and boundary conditions so you can compare them on evidence rather than preference.

Indicative planning figures only — final sizing belongs to the supplier's detailed design. Request comparable supplier quotes · all cold chain tools

Get Free QuotesFind the Best Solution