How to accept and measure a cold storage upgrade: KPIs before and after
Updated: · ColdMatch Group
Also available in: Español · Français · עברית · Português

Quick answer
Define KPIs and the measurement method before the contract is signed: temperature stability and uniformity, pull-down under a stated load, energy normalised by throughput and weather, uptime, product loss and total cost. Measure the baseline with the same instruments, run acceptance tests at handover, then compare like-for-like periods after the upgrade.
Temperatures and conditions depend on the product and local law. Confirm with your food-safety authority and product specification.
Why write the measurement plan first?
If KPIs are agreed only after installation, results become a debate. Writing them into the RFQ and contract gives every bidder the same target and lets you verify outcomes. The measurement-and-verification approach in IPMVP and the baseline concept in ISO 50001 are useful references.
KPI template
| KPI | How to measure | Baseline source | Acceptance basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature stability | Calibrated loggers at agreed positions, fixed interval | Existing logs or pre-project mapping | Within the product's specified range for the agreed share of time |
| Uniformity | Mapping across heights and zones, empty and loaded | Pre-project mapping | Agreed maximum spread between positions |
| Pull-down / recovery | Time to return to range after a stated test load or door cycle | Historical recovery times | Contractual time at stated conditions |
| Energy | Sub-meter on refrigeration, kWh per tonne, weather-normalised | 12-month baseline | Reported with method; no guaranteed figure unless contracted |
| Uptime | Hours available ÷ scheduled hours; fault log | Maintenance history | Agreed minimum, with response times |
| Product loss | Value or tonnes lost per period, by cause | Spoilage and claims records | Tracked; attributed only where cause is evidenced |
| Total cost | Energy + maintenance + losses + capex amortisation | Prior year accounts | Reviewed at 12 months |
Acceptance tests at handover
- Instrument check: sensor calibration certificates and positions agreed.
- Empty-room pull-down and stability test.
- Loaded or simulated-load test at stated conditions.
- Alarm, backup and failover test.
- Defrost cycle observation and recovery.
- Documentation: as-built drawings, settings, refrigerant records, training.
How to compare before and after fairly
Normalised energy = kWh ÷ tonnes handled, compared for months with similar outdoor temperature. Change = (after − before) ÷ before. If throughput, product mix or opening hours changed, report that alongside the result instead of hiding it.
Hypothetical: before 70 kWh/t, after 63 kWh/t in months with similar weather and mix gives −10%. This is a measured change for that period, not a forecast for future years.
What if there is no baseline?
Measure for at least several representative weeks before work starts. If that is impossible, agree an engineering estimate in writing and label all comparisons as indicative.
How do you make bids comparable in the RFQ?
Ask every bidder to answer the same lines, on the same basis, and to attach evidence. Leave a column for what you verified yourself.
| RFQ line | Basis every bidder must use | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigeration capacity | Your stated design ambient, room temperature and product intake | Selection sheets at those conditions |
| Energy | Your throughput profile and tariff | Calculation method and assumptions |
| Scope and exclusions | Same scope list (civil, electrical, controls, refrigerant, removal of old plant) | Signed scope matrix |
| Commissioning and acceptance | The KPI template above | Test procedure and instrument list |
| Service | Response time, spares, training | Service contract draft, local technician details on request |
| Lifecycle cost | Same horizon and tariff | Itemised maintenance and replacement assumptions |
To screen whether a retrofit or extra capacity fits your data, use the calculator in the related guide on adding capacity vs upgrading.
Checklist
- KPIs, methods and instruments written into the RFQ
- Baseline measured with the same instruments
- Acceptance test procedure and pass criteria signed
- Responsibility for each KPI assigned
- 3-, 6- and 12-month review dates set
- Reports compared like-for-like and published internally
Acceptable temperatures are product-specific and set by specifications and local law. Measurement verifies results; it does not guarantee savings or shelf life.
Frequently asked questions
Who should run the acceptance test?
The installer usually runs it; you or an independent engineer should witness it and keep the raw data.
Can a supplier guarantee energy savings?
Only if it is written into the contract with a defined baseline, method and adjustments. Otherwise treat estimates as indicative.
How long after the upgrade should I measure?
Short-term at handover, then over a full year to capture seasons.
How do I attribute reduced spoilage to the upgrade?
Only when records show the earlier losses were caused by what the upgrade changed, and other factors stayed similar.
Tools and next steps
Sources and standards
- Efficiency Valuation Organization — IPMVP (measurement and verification of savings)
- ISO 50001 — Energy management systems (energy baselines and performance indicators)
- FAO & UNEP (2022). Sustainable Food Cold Chains: Opportunities, Challenges and the Way Forward
- Codex Alimentarius — General Principles of Food Hygiene (CXC 1-1969) and codes of practice
