Worked project case study · Japan

Cold room project case study in Japan: Seismic-compliant automated frozen store, Kanto region

A high-bay automated frozen warehouse where seismic design, energy efficiency and 24/7 dispatch reliability drove every engineering decision.

Direct answer

A 2,800-pallet −18 to −25 °c frozen facility in Japan of roughly 12,600 m³, built with co2 (r744) transcritical or cascade, models at about USD 19,411,917 installed (USD 15,529,533USD 25,235,492 planning range) and USD 2,010,880 a year to run, over a 68-week programme from brief to handover. Figures are indicative planning estimates from ColdMatch Group's country cost model — not a quotation.

Human Global Expert GuidanceVendor-Neutral ProcurementQualified International SuppliersCommercial Confidentiality

A senior cold-chain specialist stays with your project from first brief to commissioning.

Project profile

What was built, and for whom

Buyer
Food logistics operator serving convenience retail
Product
Frozen prepared food and desserts
Capacity
2,800 pallets · 12,600 m³
Temperature class
−18 to −25 °C frozen
Refrigeration system
CO2 (R744) transcritical or cascade
Site status
New build including civil works
Design ambient
36 °C peak

Hot and humid — higher defrost energy and infiltration load

Grid
Stable grid — backup sized for short interruptions

~10 generator hours modelled per year

Indicative tariff
0.160 USD/kWh

Local band 0.140–0.200 USD/kWh

Zones

  • Automated high-bay frozen store −25 °C, 2,800 pallets
  • Chilled sortation area +5 °C
  • Dock with high-speed doors and airlocks
Costs

What a project like this costs in Japan

Derived from the same indicative country cost model used by the public ColdMatch calculators: local construction cost index, design ambient, humidity, grid reliability, diesel price and electricity tariff. Planning-grade estimates, never a quotation.

Installed CAPEX
USD 19,411,917

Planning range USD 15,529,533–USD 25,235,492

CAPEX per pallet
USD 6,933

USD 1,541 per m³

Annual OPEX
USD 2,010,880

49% of it is energy

OPEX per pallet / year
USD 718

709 kW average refrigeration load

CAPEX breakdown
Envelope, plant, electrical and installationUSD 13,623,513
Standby generationUSD 953,646
Monitoring and alarmsUSD 66,528
Automation / storage systemsUSD 4,768,230
Total installedUSD 19,411,917
Annual OPEX breakdown
Grid electricity (6,207,773 kWh)USD 993,244
Standby diesel (1,687 litres)USD 2,108
Maintenance and sparesUSD 795,112
Operations labour (12 staff)USD 215,040
Monitoring and complianceUSD 5,376
Total per yearUSD 2,010,880

Running the same facility on legacy fixed-speed plant models at USD 2,532,833 a year — about USD 521,953 more, which is the efficiency decision this project turned on.

Constraints

What made this project difficult in Japan

These are the local realities that change the design, the price and the supplier shortlist.

  • Seismic design requirements for racking, plant and piping
  • 24/7 convenience-retail dispatch with no tolerance for downtime
  • High energy cost and strict efficiency expectations
Engineering decisions

The decisions that shaped the result

  • Seismic restraint engineered for racking, pipework and plant as one package
  • CO₂ system with heat recovery and N+1 on critical duty
  • Automation designed around continuous dispatch windows
Timeline

Programme: about 68 weeks from brief to handover

Phases overlap in practice. This sequence shows where the schedule risk sits in this market.

  1. 1

    Brief and feasibility

    Weeks 13 · 3 weeks

    Product, temperature, capacity, site status, electrical supply, budget band and timeline confirmed. ColdMatch reviews the brief and flags missing data before anyone is approached.

  2. 2

    Concept design and RFQ preparation

    Weeks 47 · 4 weeks

    Zone layout, load estimate, system shortlist and a single bid form so every supplier quotes identical scope, exclusions and assumptions.

  3. 3

    Supplier review and tendering

    Weeks 813 · 6 weeks

    Suitable suppliers are approached only after internal approval, then proposals are normalised on scope, energy assumptions, spares, commissioning and warranty.

  4. 4

    Civil works and building envelope

    Weeks 1433 · 20 weeks

    Slab, drainage, docks and structure, including under-floor heating detail where freezer rooms sit on grade.

  5. 5

    Equipment manufacture and delivery

    Weeks 3449 · 16 weeks

    Plant and panel manufacture with delivery sequenced to the installation programme.

  6. 6

    Installation and insulation

    Weeks 5063 · 14 weeks

    Panel erection, pipework, electrical and automation installation with a written interface responsibility matrix between refrigeration and automation scopes.

  7. 7

    Commissioning, pull-down and handover

    Weeks 6468 · 5 weeks

    Leak and pressure testing, staged pull-down, performance verification against the specified duty, operator training, spares handover and documentation.

Outcomes

What the project delivered

  • Dispatch reliability maintained with redundancy on critical plant
  • Energy efficiency targets met with verified modelling
  • Seismic compliance documented across all disciplines
Lessons

What buyers in this market should take from it

  • Seismic restraint spans several trades — assign one owner in the contract
  • Redundancy should follow the dispatch commitment, not the equipment list
Model your own numbers

Tools and market data for Japan

Change the capacity, temperature and system and the numbers above move. These tools use the same country model.

FAQ

Cold storage project costs and timelines in Japan

How ColdMatch Group works — independent B2B procurement and sourcing platform ColdMatch Group is an independent B2B procurement and sourcing platform for industrial refrigeration, cold storage and cold-chain projects from USD $250K+, connecting buyers with qualified third-party suppliers, EPC contractors and independent financing providers.

Have a comparable project in Japan?

Submit your product type, temperatures, capacity, site status, power situation, budget band and timeline. David and the ColdMatch team review the brief, structure the RFQ so every supplier quotes the same scope, and approach suitable suppliers only after internal approval.

This is a worked project example built from ColdMatch Group's indicative country cost model — local electricity tariff, design ambient, humidity, grid reliability and construction cost index. It is a planning-grade illustration, not a client transaction, an engineering design or a quotation. Supplier and manufacturer listings on this site are provided for research, transparency and discovery only. ColdMatch Group does not provide automatic buyer-supplier introductions. Every cold chain project request is reviewed manually by David / ColdMatch Group, and supplier introductions are made only after internal approval.

Supplier and manufacturer listings are provided for research, transparency and discovery only. ColdMatch Group does not provide automatic buyer-supplier introductions. Every cold chain project request is reviewed manually by David / ColdMatch Group, and supplier introductions are made only after internal approval.

Get Free QuotesFind the Best Solution