Worked project case study · the United States

Cold room project case study in the United States: Automated 3,500-pallet frozen distribution centre, US Midwest

A greenfield automated frozen DC where refrigerant strategy, utility incentives and automation throughput were evaluated together rather than in sequence.

Direct answer

A 3,500-pallet −18 to −25 °c frozen facility in the United States of roughly 15,800 m³, built with co2 (r744) transcritical or cascade, models at about USD 23,734,757 installed (USD 18,987,806USD 30,855,184 planning range) and USD 1,976,850 a year to run, over a 68-week programme from brief to handover. Figures are indicative planning estimates from ColdMatch Group's country cost model — not a quotation.

Human Global Expert GuidanceVendor-Neutral ProcurementQualified International SuppliersCommercial Confidentiality

A senior cold-chain specialist stays with your project from first brief to commissioning.

Project profile

What was built, and for whom

Buyer
National food distribution operator
Product
Frozen distribution for retail and foodservice
Capacity
3,500 pallets · 15,800 m³
Temperature class
−18 to −25 °C frozen
Refrigeration system
CO2 (R744) transcritical or cascade
Site status
New build including civil works
Design ambient
37 °C peak

Moderate humidity — standard defrost and condenser selection

Grid
Stable grid — backup sized for short interruptions

~35 generator hours modelled per year

Indicative tariff
0.090 USD/kWh

Local band 0.070–0.140 USD/kWh

Zones

  • Automated frozen store −25 °C, 3,500 pallets
  • Chilled staging +2 °C
  • Cross-dock area with high-speed doors
Costs

What a project like this costs in the United States

Derived from the same indicative country cost model used by the public ColdMatch calculators: local construction cost index, design ambient, humidity, grid reliability, diesel price and electricity tariff. Planning-grade estimates, never a quotation.

Installed CAPEX
USD 23,734,757

Planning range USD 18,987,806–USD 30,855,184

CAPEX per pallet
USD 6,781

USD 1,502 per m³

Annual OPEX
USD 1,976,850

35% of it is energy

OPEX per pallet / year
USD 565

870 kW average refrigeration load

CAPEX breakdown
Envelope, plant, electrical and installationUSD 16,656,759
Standby generationUSD 1,165,973
Monitoring and alarmsUSD 82,160
Automation / storage systemsUSD 5,829,866
Total installedUSD 23,734,757
Annual OPEX breakdown
Grid electricity (7,617,560 kWh)USD 685,580
Standby diesel (7,244 litres)USD 7,244
Maintenance and sparesUSD 987,366
Operations labour (16 staff)USD 291,200
Monitoring and complianceUSD 5,460
Total per yearUSD 1,976,850

Running the same facility on legacy fixed-speed plant models at USD 2,340,160 a year — about USD 363,310 more, which is the efficiency decision this project turned on.

Constraints

What made this project difficult in the United States

These are the local realities that change the design, the price and the supplier shortlist.

  • Utility incentive programmes require modelled and verified savings
  • Wide seasonal ambient swing between summer and winter
  • Throughput commitments to retail customers
Engineering decisions

The decisions that shaped the result

  • CO₂ system selected with a climate-specific model rather than a generic comparison
  • Automation throughput validated by simulation before award
  • Incentive documentation prepared with the supplier during design
Timeline

Programme: about 68 weeks from brief to handover

Phases overlap in practice. This sequence shows where the schedule risk sits in this market.

  1. 1

    Brief and feasibility

    Weeks 13 · 3 weeks

    Product, temperature, capacity, site status, electrical supply, budget band and timeline confirmed. ColdMatch reviews the brief and flags missing data before anyone is approached.

  2. 2

    Concept design and RFQ preparation

    Weeks 47 · 4 weeks

    Zone layout, load estimate, system shortlist and a single bid form so every supplier quotes identical scope, exclusions and assumptions.

  3. 3

    Supplier review and tendering

    Weeks 813 · 6 weeks

    Suitable suppliers are approached only after internal approval, then proposals are normalised on scope, energy assumptions, spares, commissioning and warranty.

  4. 4

    Civil works and building envelope

    Weeks 1433 · 20 weeks

    Slab, drainage, docks and structure, including under-floor heating detail where freezer rooms sit on grade.

  5. 5

    Equipment manufacture and delivery

    Weeks 3449 · 16 weeks

    Plant and panel manufacture with delivery sequenced to the installation programme.

  6. 6

    Installation and insulation

    Weeks 5063 · 14 weeks

    Panel erection, pipework, electrical and automation installation with a written interface responsibility matrix between refrigeration and automation scopes.

  7. 7

    Commissioning, pull-down and handover

    Weeks 6468 · 5 weeks

    Leak and pressure testing, staged pull-down, performance verification against the specified duty, operator training, spares handover and documentation.

Outcomes

What the project delivered

  • Utility incentives captured because the modelling was done pre-award
  • Throughput commitments met at commissioning
  • Refrigerant strategy aligned with long-term regulation
Lessons

What buyers in this market should take from it

  • CO₂ vs ammonia is a climate and duty question — never a slogan
  • Simulate automation throughput before you sign, not after
Model your own numbers

Tools and market data for the United States

Change the capacity, temperature and system and the numbers above move. These tools use the same country model.

FAQ

Cold storage project costs and timelines in the United States

How ColdMatch Group works — independent B2B procurement and sourcing platform ColdMatch Group is an independent B2B procurement and sourcing platform for industrial refrigeration, cold storage and cold-chain projects from USD $250K+, connecting buyers with qualified third-party suppliers, EPC contractors and independent financing providers.

Have a comparable project in the United States?

Submit your product type, temperatures, capacity, site status, power situation, budget band and timeline. David and the ColdMatch team review the brief, structure the RFQ so every supplier quotes the same scope, and approach suitable suppliers only after internal approval.

This is a worked project example built from ColdMatch Group's indicative country cost model — local electricity tariff, design ambient, humidity, grid reliability and construction cost index. It is a planning-grade illustration, not a client transaction, an engineering design or a quotation. Supplier and manufacturer listings on this site are provided for research, transparency and discovery only. ColdMatch Group does not provide automatic buyer-supplier introductions. Every cold chain project request is reviewed manually by David / ColdMatch Group, and supplier introductions are made only after internal approval.

Supplier and manufacturer listings are provided for research, transparency and discovery only. ColdMatch Group does not provide automatic buyer-supplier introductions. Every cold chain project request is reviewed manually by David / ColdMatch Group, and supplier introductions are made only after internal approval.

Get Free QuotesFind the Best Solution